Workshop Evaluation Form¶
DBE Coding and Robotics Teacher Training¶
Name (Optional): __ School: __ Date: _____
Section 1: Overall Workshop Rating¶
Overall Satisfaction¶
How satisfied are you with the workshop? - [ ] Very Satisfied - [ ] Satisfied - [ ] Neutral - [ ] Dissatisfied - [ ] Very Dissatisfied
Overall Rating (1-5, where 5 is excellent): - [ ] 5 - Excellent - [ ] 4 - Very Good - [ ] 3 - Good - [ ] 2 - Fair - [ ] 1 - Poor
Section 2: Daily Sessions Evaluation¶
Day 1: Introduction to Coding with Scratch¶
Rating (1-5): [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5
What Worked Well:
What Could Be Improved:
Most Valuable:
Day 2: Advanced Scratch Programming¶
Rating (1-5): [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5
What Worked Well:
What Could Be Improved:
Most Valuable:
Day 3: Physical Computing with Scratch for Arduino¶
Rating (1-5): [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5
What Worked Well:
What Could Be Improved:
Most Valuable:
Day 4: Coding & Robotics with Micro:bit – Part 1¶
Rating (1-5): [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5
What Worked Well:
What Could Be Improved:
Most Valuable:
Day 5: Coding & Robotics with Micro:bit – Part 2 (Code Club Intro)¶
Rating (1-5): [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5
What Worked Well:
What Could Be Improved:
Most Valuable:
Section 3: Content Evaluation¶
Relevance¶
How relevant was the content to your teaching? - [ ] Very Relevant - [ ] Relevant - [ ] Somewhat Relevant - [ ] Not Very Relevant - [ ] Not Relevant
Which topics were most relevant? - [ ] Scratch programming (Days 1–2) - [ ] Arduino / S4A physical computing (Day 3) - [ ] Micro:bit (Days 4–5) - [ ] Code Club (Day 5) - [ ] Curriculum integration - [ ] Assessment strategies - [ ] All topics
Depth and Coverage¶
Was the content: - [ ] Too basic - [ ] Just right - [ ] Too advanced - [ ] Mixed (some too basic, some too advanced)
What needed more depth?
What could be condensed?
Balance¶
Was there a good balance of: - Theory and practice: [ ] Yes [ ] No - Individual and group work: [ ] Yes [ ] No - Instruction and exploration: [ ] Yes [ ] No - Support and challenge: [ ] Yes [ ] No
Section 4: Learning Outcomes¶
Skills Developed¶
Rate your improvement in each area (1-5):
Scratch Programming (Days 1–2): - [ ] 1 - No improvement - [ ] 2 - Slight improvement - [ ] 3 - Moderate improvement - [ ] 4 - Significant improvement - [ ] 5 - Major improvement
Arduino / S4A Physical Computing (Day 3): - [ ] 1 - No improvement - [ ] 2 - Slight improvement - [ ] 3 - Moderate improvement - [ ] 4 - Significant improvement - [ ] 5 - Major improvement
Micro:bit (Days 4–5): - [ ] 1 - No improvement - [ ] 2 - Slight improvement - [ ] 3 - Moderate improvement - [ ] 4 - Significant improvement - [ ] 5 - Major improvement
Curriculum Integration: - [ ] 1 - No improvement - [ ] 2 - Slight improvement - [ ] 3 - Moderate improvement - [ ] 4 - Significant improvement - [ ] 5 - Major improvement
Assessment Strategies: - [ ] 1 - No improvement - [ ] 2 - Slight improvement - [ ] 3 - Moderate improvement - [ ] 4 - Significant improvement - [ ] 5 - Major improvement
Confidence Level¶
How confident do you feel to: Teach coding/robotics to students: - [ ] Very Confident - [ ] Confident - [ ] Somewhat Confident - [ ] Not Very Confident - [ ] Not Confident
Integrate into your curriculum: - [ ] Very Confident - [ ] Confident - [ ] Somewhat Confident - [ ] Not Very Confident - [ ] Not Confident
Troubleshoot technical issues: - [ ] Very Confident - [ ] Confident - [ ] Somewhat Confident - [ ] Not Very Confident - [ ] Not Confident
Section 5: Materials and Resources¶
Quality of Materials¶
Workshop Materials: - [ ] Excellent - [ ] Good - [ ] Adequate - [ ] Poor - [ ] Not provided
Handouts/Guides: - [ ] Excellent - [ ] Good - [ ] Adequate - [ ] Poor - [ ] Not provided
Online Resources: - [ ] Excellent - [ ] Good - [ ] Adequate - [ ] Poor - [ ] Not provided
Hardware/Equipment: - [ ] Excellent - [ ] Good - [ ] Adequate - [ ] Poor - [ ] Not provided
Usefulness¶
Which materials were most useful? 1. __ 2. __ 3. _____
Which materials need improvement? 1. __ 2. __ 3. _____
Section 6: Facilitators¶
Facilitator Quality¶
Knowledge of Content: - [ ] Excellent - [ ] Good - [ ] Adequate - [ ] Poor
Clarity of Instruction: - [ ] Excellent - [ ] Good - [ ] Adequate - [ ] Poor
Responsiveness to Questions: - [ ] Excellent - [ ] Good - [ ] Adequate - [ ] Poor
Support Provided: - [ ] Excellent - [ ] Good - [ ] Adequate - [ ] Poor
Overall: - [ ] Excellent - [ ] Good - [ ] Adequate - [ ] Poor
Feedback for Facilitators¶
What did facilitators do well?
What could facilitators improve?
Section 7: Logistics¶
Venue and Facilities¶
Venue: - [ ] Excellent - [ ] Good - [ ] Adequate - [ ] Poor
Facilities: - [ ] Excellent - [ ] Good - [ ] Adequate - [ ] Poor
Technology/Equipment: - [ ] Excellent - [ ] Good - [ ] Adequate - [ ] Poor
Schedule and Timing¶
Workshop Schedule: - [ ] Too fast - [ ] Just right - [ ] Too slow - [ ] Mixed pace
Time Allocation: - [ ] Too much time on some topics - [ ] Just right - [ ] Not enough time on some topics
Breaks: - [ ] Adequate - [ ] Not enough - [ ] Too many
Section 8: Impact and Application¶
Immediate Plans¶
Do you plan to use what you learned? - [ ] Yes, immediately - [ ] Yes, within a month - [ ] Yes, within 3 months - [ ] Yes, within a year - [ ] Not sure - [ ] No
What will you implement first?
Barriers to Implementation¶
What barriers do you anticipate? (Check all that apply) - [ ] Lack of resources - [ ] Limited time - [ ] Lack of support - [ ] Student readiness - [ ] Technical challenges - [ ] Curriculum constraints - [ ] Other: _____
Support Needed¶
What ongoing support do you need? - [ ] Technical support - [ ] Curriculum guidance - [ ] Resource access - [ ] Peer network - [ ] Follow-up training - [ ] Other: _____
Section 9: Recommendations¶
For Future Workshops¶
What should be added?
What should be removed?
What should be changed?
For Other Teachers¶
Would you recommend this workshop to colleagues? - [ ] Definitely - [ ] Probably - [ ] Maybe - [ ] Probably not - [ ] Definitely not
Why?
Section 10: Additional Comments¶
General Comments¶
What was the best part of the workshop?
What was the most challenging part?
Any other comments or suggestions?
Section 11: Contact and Follow-up¶
Stay Connected¶
Would you like to: - [ ] Join teacher network - [ ] Receive follow-up resources - [ ] Participate in follow-up sessions - [ ] Share your implementation experiences - [ ] Provide ongoing feedback
Contact Preference: - [ ] Email - [ ] WhatsApp - [ ] Phone - [ ] Other: _____
Thank You!¶
Your feedback helps us improve future workshops and support teachers better.
Evaluation Completed: [ ] Yes Date: _____
Note: All responses are confidential and will be used to improve the workshop program.